The Bridge Strategy Type I → Type II

The two-stage approach that works for many growth-stage SaaS companies.

This is the right strategy for most growth-stage SaaS companies that have immediate sales pressure AND long-term Type II requirements.

Month 0–3: 

Readiness + Type I audit Month 3: Type I report issued, Type II observation period begins Month 9–12: Type II observation ends, Type II audit begins Month 12–14: Type II report issued

Why this works

Type I gives you something to show customers in month 3 The work for Type I IS the readiness work for Type II no waste Observation period runs while you’re closing deals with the Type I report - Type II is a continuation, not a restart

Cost:

$60K–$160K total for both reports — usually less than 1.5x the cost of a Type II alone.

Time:

12–14 months from kickoff to Type II report, with a Type I report in hand by month 3.

When to Skip Type I Entirely

Most mature security organizations should skip Type I and go directly to Type II.

Skip Type I if

Your controls are already operating (you just need them audited) - You have no immediate sales pressure - You’d rather save $20K–$40K - Your customers are willing to wait 8–14 months for Type II

Going directly to Type II

Saves $20K–$40K - Saves 2–3 months of audit prep time - Eliminates one audit cycle of organizational disruption - Produces a single, stronger report

Don’t skip Type I if

You’d genuinely lose deals without an interim report - Your team needs the forcing function of an early audit milestone - Your security program is still being built

Common Mistakes

SOC 2 is expensive. The cost of not having SOC 2 is often higher.

Need help deciding?

Cyber Security Services helps every client make the Type I vs Type II call as part of free scoping. We’re auditor-agnostic and have no incentive to push one over the other.
The SOC 2 Audit Process-image

Getting Type I and stopping

Some companies get a Type I report, hand it to a few customers, and then never pursue Type II. By year two, the Type I report is outdated and customers are asking for current Type II. You’re back at square one.

Choosing Type II to “save money” by skipping Type I — but not being ready

Going directly to Type II with weak controls produces a Type II report with exceptions. That’s worse than a clean Type I followed by a clean Type II.

Picking a 6-month observation window when 12 makes sense

A 12-month observation window produces a stronger report and aligns better with enterprise annual cycles. The extra 6 months of operation is usually worth more than the speed of issuing 6 months sooner

Doing readiness for Type I, then a different consultant for Type II

Switching consultants between Type I and Type II loses context, forces re-discovery, and inflates cost. Pick a consultant who can do both.

Not planning for annual Type II renewal

Type II is annual. The cost shows up year after year. Plan for ongoing compliance from day one — don’t treat the first report as the finish line.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I do Type II without first doing Type I?
Yes. Most mature security organizations do exactly this. Type I is not a prerequisite for Type II.
The readiness work does. The Type I report itself is a separate deliverable and doesn’t replace any part of the Type II audit.
Yes, and most do. Continuity of auditor saves time on the Type II because they already understand your environment.
Until the date covered (it’s a point-in-time report). Most enterprise buyers consider Type I reports stale after 12 months.
The report covers a specific observation period. After 12 months, you need a new Type II covering the next period. Bridge letters cover short gaps between reports.
No. The AICPA requires a minimum of 6 months for Type II observation.
Often yes. A Type I report plus a documented Type II plan (with target date) satisfies many enterprise procurement teams as an interim measure.
You can usually go directly to Type II if your controls have been operating for 6+ months with evidence. The challenge is proving the operation — that’s where readiness work focuses.
A qualified report has exceptions — the auditor found controls that didn’t operate as designed. It’s still a valid report but is weaker than an unqualified (“clean”) report.
Only if your services are relevant to your customers’ financial reporting. Most SaaS and cloud companies need SOC 2 only.

Get the Right SOC 2 for Your Situation

The Type I vs Type II decision affects $40K–$80K of spend and 6–10 months of timeline. Getting it right matters.
Cyber Security Services helps every client make this call as part of free scoping — based on your actual customer requirements, sales timeline, and security maturity. We have no incentive to push one over the other.